Legal Opinion

Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. Arnold

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 31, 1901No. 3,262PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From the Grant Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenley, C. J.

The only question presented by the record in this case is as to the sufficiency of the complaint. The complaint in so far as it is necessary to present the questions discussed is as follows: “Plaintiff avers that on the 24th day of May, 1898, desiring to go from said city of Muncie, Delaware county, Indiana, to the city of Decatur, in Adams county, Indiana, he did at about 7 o’clock a. m. on said day *191purchase a ticket of the defendant at its regular depot and station in said city of Muneie and which said ticket was for passage over the defendant’s railroad and said connecting line from Muneie…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Goddard v. Grand Trunk RailwaySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1869
  2. Chicago & Alton Railroad v. PillsburyIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Britton v. Atlanta & Charlotte Air-Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  4. Winnegar's Administrator v. Central Passenger Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1887
  5. Pittsburgh, Fort Wayne & Chicago Railway Co. v. HindsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1867

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Terre Haute, Indianapolis & Eastern Traction Co. v. ScottIndiana Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Smith v. Camel City Cab Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  3. Culberson v. Empire Coal Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  4. Stanley v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API