Legal Opinion

Lane v. Kaney

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 22, 1990No. 89-2312PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is before the court on a petition for writ of mandamus. Petitioner seeks a name change from the circuit court and the judge has failed or refused to act; we know not which because two orders for response have been essentially unanswered. An assistant attorney general alleges that perhaps petitioner is not entitled to action by the circuit court because he is a prisoner domiciled in another county thus may not be entitled to an order of the court. We cannot agree this is sufficient reason for the trial judge to not act upon the pending case. It should be decided one way or…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gosby v. Third Judicial CircuitSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  2. Gosby v. Third Judicial Circuit CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  3. Kaplan v. DickeyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API