State Ex Rel. Kenney v. Ranslow
Connecticut Superior Court
1Opinion of the CourtRyan, J.
This is an action of quo warranto to require the defendant to answer to this court by what warrant he claims to hold the office of chief of police of the town of Wolcott. The parties have stipulated to most of the facts but a hearing was required to present evidence on matters wherein the stipulation was inconclusive. In this proceeding the burden of proof is upon the defendant to establish his legal right to the office. State ex rel. Jewett v. Satti, 133 Conn. 687.
The defendant is forty-one years of age and has been a resident of the town of Wolcott for twenty-one years. In 1939 he was…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. McCreary v. MajorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Rushville Gas Co. v. City of RushvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- People, Ex Rel. Woods v. . CrisseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Launtz v. People ex rel. SullivanIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
- State ex rel. Burdick v. TyrrellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Nesbitt v. AppleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Nesbitt v. AppleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- People Ex Rel. Scott v. GrivettiIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
- People Ex Rel. Scott v. GrivettiIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
- Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1965