Legal Opinion

Harris v. Vatter

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 18, 1940No. 17279PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

McCALEB, Judge.

After this cause was submitted on rehearing, counsel for plaintiff filed with us a motion to remand the matter for the purpose of permitting plaintiff to introduce testimony in rebuttal of the evidence given by the defendant’s witnesses. We find that the motion is untimely because it cannot be said that plaintiff was taken by surprise by the evidence adduced on behalf of the defendant. Counsel does not show that he requested a continuance from the trial judge and were we to grant this unusual request, it would serve as a precedent to stifle and hinder the orderly processes of…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Griffin v. Aetna Casualty and Surety CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API