Legal Opinion

Fly v. Royal Auto Repair

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 19, 1988No. 52195PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SATZ, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff appeals the trial court’s grant of a directed verdict for defendant at the close of defendant's case. We affirm.

To review a directed verdict for a defendant, we view the evidence and infer-enees in the light favorable to plaintiff and disregard all contrary evidence and inferences. See, e.g., Green v. Crunden Martin Mfg. Co., 575 S.W.2d 930, 932 (Mo.App.1978). If, however, reasonable grounds support the directed verdict, we affirm. McCellan v. Highland Sales and Investment Co., 514 S.W.2d 371, 374 (Mo.App.1974).

On appeal, counsel consistently refers to the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Nichols v. BlakeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  2. Green v. Crunden Martin Manufacturing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Glass v. Allied Van Lines, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Sunny Baer Co., Inc. v. SlatenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. McClellan v. Highland Sales & Investment Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lindsey Masonry Co. v. Jenkins & Associates Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Sisters of St. Mary v. BlairMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Heutel v. StumpfMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Douglas v. HawkinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Allied Services v. Smash My Trash, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API