Legal Opinion

Bradford v. Weinstein

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided November 22, 1974No. Nos. 73-1751, 73-1921PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WINTER, Circuit Judge:

These two appeals present two important questions: Does the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment have any application to the conduct of proceedings by a parole board in states which undertake to grant paroles to certain prisoners before service in full of the sentences imposed upon them? If so, may the prisoners complain of a denial of due process in a suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, where the sole basis of their complaint is the manner in which the proceedings were conducted and there is no claim that they are entitled to immediate or even earlier release? We…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. State v. WolfeIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Franklin v. ShieldsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
  3. Sidney F. Brown, Jr. v. David C. Lundgren, Warden, Federal Correctional InstitutionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  4. Richard S. Pope v. Charles P. Chew, Chairman, Virginia Parole & Probation Board or His Successor, Members of the Parole & Probation BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
  5. Rodney R. Haymes v. Paul J. Regan, Commissioner, New York State Parole Board Parole Board of July 29, 1974Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API