Legal Opinion

Minneapolis Times Co. v. Nimocks

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 1, 1893PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by defendant, Charles A. Nimocks, from an order of the District Court of Hennepin County, Henry G. Hicks, J., made November 19, 1892, denying his motion for a new trial.

Read the full summary

Appeal by defendant, Charles A. Nimocks, from an order of the District Court of Hennepin County, Henry G. Hicks, J., made November 19, 1892, denying his motion for a new trial. The plaintiff, the Minneapolis Times Company, is a corporation organized December 12, 1890, under 1878 G. S. ch. 34, title 2, for the purpose of publishing a newspaper and carrying on a printing and publishing business at Minneapolis, with a capital stock of $200,000 in shares of $100 each, to be paid in at such times and in such installments as the board of directors might determine. On November 27, 1891, defendant…

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

This was an action to recover a call or assessment on the stock of the plaintiff corporation.

From an examination of the record we are satisfied that the trial court correctly ruled that upon the evidence the only question for the jury was whether the defendant had notice of the assess*384ment, and upon that question the evidence abundantly justified the verdict. It must consequently be affirmed, unless the court committed some error of law during the trial.

1. The allowance of the amendments to the complaint on the trial was clearly a proper exercise of discretion on part of the court.

2. It is…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. O'Rourke v. Grand Opera House Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Troy Mining Co. v. WhiteSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Rogers v. Clark Iron Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  4. State v. SpaldingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  5. Bank of National City v. JohnstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API