Legal Opinion

Moody v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided May 2, 1995No. Docket Nos. 2566-88, 1659-89UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEARN MOODY, JR., Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Moody v. Commissioner

Docket Nos. 2566-88, 1659-89

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 1995-195; 1995 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 195; 69 T.C.M. (CCH) 2517; T.C.M. (RIA) 95195;

May 2, 1995, Filed

Decisions will be entered under Rule 155.

For petitioner: William R. Cousins, III, Joel N. Crouch, and Charles M. Meadows, Jr.

For respondent: Melanie R. Urban and David E. Whitcomb.

WRIGHT

WRIGHT

MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION

WRIGHT, Judge: By timely notices of deficiency, respondent determined deficiencies in excise taxes pursuant to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ramon Portillo and Dolores Portillo v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  2. Estate of Reis v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1986
  3. Larchmont Foundation, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1979

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Moody v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1995
  2. the Moody Foundation and John Cornyn, Attorney General of the State of Texas v. Estate of Shearn Moody, Jr., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API