Legal Opinion
Johnson v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 15, 1966No. 65-783PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellant seeks review of an order denying his motion for relief pursuant to Criminal Pi-ocedure Rule I, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix. The grounds upon which relief is sought are an attempt to review the sufficiency of the evidence.
A motion under Criminal Procedure Rule I may not be used as a substitute for an appeal upon the merits. Mitchell v. State, Fla.App.1964, 167 So.2d 27; Austin v. State, Fla.App.1964, 160 So.2d 730.
Affirmed.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Austin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
- Mitchell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
3Cited by2 opinions
- Harrington v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Miller v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970