Legal Opinion

Johnson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 15, 1966No. 65-783PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant seeks review of an order denying his motion for relief pursuant to Criminal Pi-ocedure Rule I, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix. The grounds upon which relief is sought are an attempt to review the sufficiency of the evidence.

A motion under Criminal Procedure Rule I may not be used as a substitute for an appeal upon the merits. Mitchell v. State, Fla.App.1964, 167 So.2d 27; Austin v. State, Fla.App.1964, 160 So.2d 730.

Affirmed.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Austin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  2. Mitchell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Harrington v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  2. Miller v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970