Legal Opinion

Lutz v. Jawad & Haidar Y. Abulhasan Co.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 21, 1987No. A8408-05084; CA A38683PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.

Appellants petition for reconsideration, ORAP 10.10, arguing that our decision on prejudgment interest was based on an incorrect understanding of the record and represents a departure from prior decisions. 86 Or App 74, 739 P2d 26 (1987). We grant reconsideration to correct our mistake about the record; we adhere to our decision as corrected.

In our decision we said the question of prejudgment interest was raised before trial. Appellants are correct that plaintiff did not raise the issue of prejudgment interest until after trial. Plaintiff first mentioned prejudgment interest in the proposed…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lutz v. Jawad & Haidar Y. Abulhasan Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tasaki v. MoriartyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API