Legal Opinion

Silkowski v. Alvarez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 13, 2005PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Polizzi, J.), dated June 16, 2003, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that she did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendants made a prima facie showing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury as a result of the subject accident (see Insurance Law § 5102 [d]; Kearse v New York City Tr. Auth., 16 AD3d…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kearse v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. Grossman v. WrightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. Meely v. 4 G's Truck Renting Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  4. Ayzen v. MelendezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  5. Paul v. TrerotolaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mejia v. DeRoseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. Williams v. ClarkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. Gomez v. EpsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. Legendre v. Siqing BaoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  5. Olson v. RussellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API