Legal Opinion
Philip Simard v. SSA
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided October 21, 2016No. 15-cv-413-SMPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Philip Simard, Claimant v. Case No. 15-cv-413-SM Opinion No.
2016 DNH 186
Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant O R D E R Pursuant to
42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3), claimant, Philip Simard, moves to reverse or vacate the Acting Commissioner’s decision denying his applications for Disability Insurance Benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 423, and Supplemental Security Income Benefits under Title XVI,
42 U.S.C. §§ 423, 1381-1383c (the “Act”). The Acting Commissioner…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Barnhart v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Marianne Marino v. U.S. Social Security Administration, CommissionerDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2015