Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Travco Hotels, Inc. v. PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS CO., INC.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 7, 1991No. 9021SC437Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Judge PHILLIPS

concurring in part and dissenting in part.

The majority opinion is based upon mistaken premises and I dissent from it, while agreeing that the order denying defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s claim for punitive damages does not affect a substantial right and is not immediately appealable.

The dispositive issue is not whether the appeals are interlocutory — both manifestly are, since neither order finally determines any aspect of the case; there is no two-part test for determining whether an appeal or order is interlocutory; some of the discussion of these mistaken issues…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Goldston v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Lowder v. All Star Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. Lowder v. All Star Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  4. Williams v. East Coast Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API