Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fischer v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 8, 1897Published

Transferred from Kansas City Court of Appeals.

1DissentBarclay, C. J.

(dissenting). — Is this a case “involving title to real estate,” within the meaning of the qrganic law defining the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court? It is an ordinary action in the nature of replevin to recover specific personal property. The property is grain. The title to it depends, in one view of the case, on the validity of a deed of trust in the nature of a mortgage, conveying the land on which the grain grew. In another view of the case the property in the grain depends on the force and effect to be given to an agreement between plaintiff Fischer and defendant M. C. Johnson, under…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Branson v. StudabakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Campbell v. RankinSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. Town of Brushy Mound v. McClintockIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  4. State ex rel. St. Louis, Kansas City & Colorado Railroad v. RombauerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  5. Hailey v. . AnoNew York Court of Appeals · 1893

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API