Legal Opinion

Yeager v. Hurt

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 3, 1983No. 81-898PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

This action arose out of a seizure by H.F. Yeager, an auto theft investigator for the Alabama Department of Public Safety, of a motorcycle belonging to James Hurt. The seizure took place during an investigation into a motorcycle theft ring in the Columbus-Phenix City area involving primarily Kawasaki motorcycles similar to the one in question.

As a part of the investigation Sergeant Yeager asked for and received a computer printout of stolen motor vehicles from…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Smith v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. U-Haul Co. of Alabama v. LongSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  4. State ex rel. Carroll v. DevittSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  5. Gunite Contracting Co. Inc. v. MizeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Super Valu Stores, Inc. v. PetersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  2. Kohn v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  3. Ala. River Grp., Inc. v. Conecuh Timber, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2017
  4. Ocean Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Abeta Travel Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  5. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. SawyerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API