Legal Opinion

Rindge v. Grow

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1894PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Oakland. (Moore, J.')' Judgment creditors’ bill. Complainants appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, C. J.

This is a judgment creditors’ bill. Abel P. Grow, the judgment debtor, • Charles P. Grow, his son, and Joanna Grow, the wife of Charles P., are parties defendant.

In 1880, Charles P. Grow, and one Barrett formed a copartnership as dealers in boots and shoes at Milford. In 1882 the business was closed' out upon mortgages given to A. P. Grow and Barrett’s father. A prior mortgage was given to McGraw & Co., of Detroit,- which was paid at that time. The business was then conducted for about two years as Grow & Son, and thereafter in the name of A. -P. Grow. In August, 1881,-Barrett & Grow…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bean v. BergmannMichigan Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API