Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority v. First of Georgia Insurance
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WELLS, Judge.
Under the scope of our review of a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, a complaint is deemed sufficient to withstand a dismissal so long as no insurmountable bar to recovery appears on the face of the complaint and the allegations of the complaint give adequate notice of the nature and extent of the claim. Presnell v. Pell, 298 N.C. 715, 260 S.E.2d 611 (1979). A complaint should not be dismissed under Rule 12(b)(6) “unless it affirmatively appears that plaintiff is entitled to no relief under any state of facts…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Presnell v. PellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- North Carolina National Bank v. Virginia Carolina BuildersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- Ellington Ex Rel. Ellington v. BradfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- North Carolina Baptist Hospitals, Inc. v. MitchellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- Montague Bros. v. W. C. Shepherd Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.