Legal Opinion

Smith v. Raymond

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 1, 1804PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In the Court below, 1"HE plaintiff brought an action of trespass, alleging that the defendant had entered upon his land, and cut down his timber trees thereon standing ; to which title was pleaded, and the cause removed agreeably to the statute.

Read the full summary

In the Court below, 1"HE plaintiff brought an action of trespass, alleging that the defendant had entered upon his land, and cut down his timber trees thereon standing ; to which title was pleaded, and the cause removed agreeably to the statute. (a) in the Superior Court, the lowing pleadings : mse was tried on the fof ■ Plea — “ That long before the date and impetration of “ the plaintiff’s writ, one I.vke Raymond of Stamford, “ in said County, was well seized, and possessed, in his “ own right, in fee, of the land and premises, on which. “ the said trees were standing and growing ; and the…

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

The question on the pleadings, as closed, is a question of title. The plea of the defendant is not so formal as it might have been ; but, so far as respects title, is substantially good, and if true, sufficient to save the defendant from the plaintiff ’s demand. The t -¿plication of the plaintiff' is, also, somewhat informal, but substantially good, as it negates and puts in issue every part of the defendant’s pleamaterial or essen*192tial to the decision of the question of title, and Of the plaintiff’s right to recover. By the verdict of the jury nothing more is found, than, “ That…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Moore v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Ferris v. Hotel Pick Arms, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
  3. Greco v. KeenanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  4. Day v. WebbSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1859
  5. Dorfman v. Martin Crawford Motor Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API