Legal Opinion

Stebbins v. Doncasters, No. X07 Cv99 0072908s (Jul. 14, 2000)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided July 14, 2000No. X07 CV99 0072908SUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

By their thirty count third amended complaint, dated May 24, 2000, the twenty-six plaintiffs have made numerous claims against the defendant Doncasters, Inc., all relating to the plaintiffs' claims that, while in the defendant's employ, they suffered injuries and damages because of the defendant's improper utilization of toxic substances in the workplace. There are presently two motions for the court's determination. This memorandum addresses each separately. CT Page 8363

MOTION TO STRIKE

By…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Woodrow Sterling v. Velsicol Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  2. Novametrix Medical Systems, Inc. v. BOC Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  3. Suarez v. Dickmont Plastics Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  4. RK Constructors, Inc. v. Fusco Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  5. Quimby v. Kimberly Clark Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API