Legal Opinion

Fanning v. High Mountain Inspection Services, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 25, 2007No. Civil 06cv2177 (RJL)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

RICHARD J. LEON, District Judge.

Before the Court is a motion for a preliminary injunction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(a) filed by plaintiff, the Chief Executive Office of the Central Pension Fund, an employee pension benefit fund as those terms are defined in Section 3(1) and 3(3) of ERISA, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1002(1) and (3). For the following reasons, this Court DENIES plaintiffs motion.

BACKGROUND

The Central Pension Fund provides retirement, disability, and death benefits to employees working as operating engineers throughout the United States. The fund has…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Chaplaincy of Full Gospel Churches v. EnglandCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
  3. Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Ass'n v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
  4. Serono Labs Inc v. Ferring Pharm. Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
  5. Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund, a Pension Trust v. Gerber Truck Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. ['GUTTENBERG v. EMERY']District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  2. Brown v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  3. Trinity USA Operating, LLC v. BarkerDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2011
  4. Fox v. McCormickDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API