Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

In re Mitchell

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 7, 2014No. 2013-B-2688Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partWeimer, J.

hi concur with and subscribe to the majority’s opinion in all aspects except the sanction. Previously, this court held “the purpose of lawyer disciplinary proceedings is not primarily to punish the lawyer, but rather to maintain appropriate standards of professional conduct to safeguard the public, to preserve the integrity of the legal profession, and to deter other lawyers from engaging in violations of the standards of the profession.” In re Torry, 10-0837, p. 7 (La.10/19/10), 48 So.3d 1038, 1042, citing Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Guidry, 571 So.2d 161 (La.1990).

In the instant case, I…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. GuidrySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
  2. In re TorrySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2010
  3. In Re SharpSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2009
  4. In Re PetalSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2010
  5. In Re BernsteinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API