Legal Opinion

Hills v. Mason

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 28, 2025No. Civil Action No. 2023-3157Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Roland Hills, Plaintiff Pro Se, v. Case No. 23-cv-3157 (TSC) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al. Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Ronald Hills filed this action pro se against the United States and officers of the Veterans Appeals Board—Cheryl L. Mason, Kenneth A. Arnold, Jaime Areizaga-Soto, and their unnamed staff—in their official capacity, and Michael Figlioli and Sylvester Jones, employees of the Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States (“VFW”) Washington, D.C. office, pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), 28…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Gunn v. MintonSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API