Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Hill

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided May 23, 1941PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Foley, S,

At the close of the trial of the contested probate proceeding, the surrogate stated upon the minutes the determinations made by him and the reasons upon which they were based. An extended discussion of the facts in this formal decision is, therefore, deemed unnecessary. The evidence establishes that the will, dated December 15, 1938, was duly executed by the testator and that he was of sound mind and free from undue influence when he signed it on December 15, 1938. It has also been shown that the two codicils to the will were duly executed, the first in July, 1939, *775and the second in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re the Probate of the Will of CunnionNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  2. In Re the Probate of the Alleged Last Will & Testament of StickneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  3. In re the Estate of McCaffreyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1940
  4. In re StickneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  5. In re the Estate of FlynnNew York Surrogate's Court · 1940

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Probate of the Will of AndrewsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1949
  2. In re the Probate of the Will of ShinnNew York Surrogate's Court · 1956
  3. In re the Estate of MoffatNew York Surrogate's Court · 1956
  4. In re the Estate of SchildNew York Surrogate's Court · 1972
  5. In re the Probate of the Will of LevinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API