Legal Opinion
Porter v. Erickson Transport Corp.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided April 13, 1993No. 18155, 18157Published
1Opinion of the Court
851 S.W.2d 725 (1993)
Donald PORTER, Plaintiff-Respondent-Appellant,
v.
ERICKSON TRANSPORT CORP., Defendant-Appellant-Respondent, and
U.S. Aluminate Co.Maryland, Defendant.
Nos. 18155, 18157.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division One.
April 13, 1993.
Richard E. McLeod, Grace L. Spezia, The McLeod Law Firm, Kansas City, James W. Newberry, Schroff, Glass & Newberry, Springfield, for appellant/respondent Erickson.
Thomas Strong, Steve Garner, Jeffrey W. Bates, Strong & Associates, Springfield, for respondent/appellant Porter.
Kent O. Hyde, William C. Love, Harrison, Tucker & Hyde,…
Also in this document: Per curiam; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited66 opinions
- Thummel v. KingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
- Martin v. City of WashingtonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Faught Ex Rel. Faught v. WashamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- Blevins v. Cushman MotorsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1977
- Frank v. Environmental Sanitation Management, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1985
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.