Legal Opinion

United States v. Mitchell

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided July 9, 2003No. 99-0307/ARPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge BAKER

delivered the opinion of the Court.

At his original general court-martial, Appellant was convicted, contrary to his pleas, of wrongful distribution of a controlled substance (five specifications), wrongful introduction of a controlled substance with intent to distribute, larceny, adultery, and obtaining services under false pretenses in violation of Articles 112a, 121, and 134, Uniform Code of *447Military Justice [hereinafter UCMJ], 10 U.S.C. §§ 912a, 921, 934, respectively. A panel of officer and enlisted members sentenced appellant to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for ten…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. RosendahlCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
  2. United States v. JoseyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
  2. United States v. AltierCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2012
  3. United States v. TerryNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2005
  4. United States v. DiazCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
  5. United States v. DiazCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API