Legal Opinion

St. Louis, S. F. & T. Ry. Co. v. Green

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 14, 1929No. 3735PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WILLSON, O. J.

(after stating the case as above). [1] The contention of appellant that the trial court erred when he submitted to the jury an issue as to contributory negligence on the part "of appellee, and when he refused to submit issues it requested with reference to that phase of the case, is on the theory, it seems, that it appeared appellee was guilty of contributory negligence ás a matter of law, in that all the evidence was that he was instructed to inspect the car in question before he commenced the work he was to do thereon, and did not do so, and in that all the evidence was that,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. San Antonio & A. P. Ry. Co. v. BehneTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  2. Turner v. StokerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  3. Dallas Ry. Co. v. WarlickTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  4. Floyd v. Fidelity Union Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  5. St. Louis & Southwestern Railway Co. v. SchulerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. St. Louis, S. F. & T. Ry. Co. v. GreenTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API