Wilson v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBricken, P. J.
The charge, by indictment, against this defendant was the offense of miscegenation; the indictment containing the averment that this defendant (naming her) being a negro or a descendant of a negro, did intermarry or live in adultery or fornication with one Charles Medicus, a white person. The indictment is substantially in Code form and is therefore not subject to the first four grounds of demurrer interposed. Code 1907, § 7132.
The statute under which the indictment in this ease is drawn, or preferred, is not violative of the federal Constitution, nor is it null and void as insisted by…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Edwards v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- McPherson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Ward v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1856
- Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- Mitchell v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hubbard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1985
- Binion v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1975
- Arrington v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1931
- Jackson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1954
- Little v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1948
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.