Legal Opinion

A. Fink & Sons Co. v. John Huss Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 4, 1938PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPerskie, J.

The sole issue requiring decision in this cause is whether, under the circumstances here exhibited, the mortgagee’s right, if any, to receive and collect rents from the property encumbered by his mortgage, is paramount to the right of the plaintiff, as a judgment creditor of the owner of the mortgaged premises, to have a receiver appointed to receive and collect the rent from the property.

The facts have been stipulated. As stipulated they disclose the following situation: Plaintiff recovered a judgment of $316.31 plus costs from defendant corporation on September 21th, 1937. By virtue…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stewart v. Fairchild-Baldwin Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1919
  2. Del-New Co. v. JamesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
  3. Cohn v. PlassSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1915
  4. Hands v. RussellNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
  5. Hinck v. CohnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. 7.41 Acres of Land in City and County of CamdenDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API