Legal Opinion
Armstrong v. Costco Wholesale Corp.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided February 17, 2017No. 15-CV-2909PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Jack B. Weinstein, Senior United States District Judge:
I. Introduction
Five separate but related class actions are before the court. They are brought by consumers who purchased moist toilet wipes sold by retailer defendants, produced by manufacturer defendants, and marked “flushable.” Alleged are defects in labeling. Plaintiffs seek money damages and injunctive relief because they claim the product is not “flushable.” See Kurtz v. Kimberly-Clark Corp. & Costco Wholesale Corp., No. 14-CV-1142 (“Kurtz action”) *369(relying on New Jersey and New York law); Armstrong & Kurtz v. Costco Wholesale…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- D.H. Blair & Co. v. GottdienerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- New York Marine & General Insurance v. Lafarge North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Oswego Laborers' Local 214 Pension Fund v. Marine Midland Bank, N. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates, P.A. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kurtz v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- Travis v. Navient Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2018
- Penn-Star Insurance Company v. FPM Realty LLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2022
- Rue v. VMD Systems Integrators, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2025