Legal Opinion · Dissent

Swayze's Estate, Dean v. Bennett

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1948No. 8748Published

1DissentJustice Angstman

The particular portion of the will in question is the hotel provision reading: “I direct my executor to reduce sufficient of my estate to cash, such cash to be utilized for the erection and maintenance of a modern hotel at Virginia City, Montana, where no intoxicating liquors are to be sold at any time, said hotel to be maintained as a memorial to me, and I direct my executor to cause the formation of a corporation to be known as the Mary Swayze Memorial Hotel Company, to which corporation said hotel is to be conveyed and by which it is to be maintained and operated.”

At the hearing appellant…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ould v. Washington Hospital for FoundlingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Crerar v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Richards v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Quinn v. Peoples Trust & Savings Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Funk EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API