Legal Opinion

Dysinger v. Cincinnati, Saginaw & Mackinaw Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1892PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Shiawassee. (Kewton, J.) Negligence case. Defendant brings error. ‘ The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, C. J.

Plaintiff had his arm caught between two dead-woods while attempting to draw a coupling pin. He stepped in between the cars while the slack was being given in order to enable him to draw the pin. No claim is made that the road-bed or draw-bars or dead-woods were defective or out of order.

Plaintiff was between 23 and 24 years of age at the time of his employment. He had never had any experience as. *647brakeman, but had lived in the vicinity of a railroad station, and was frequently at the station and around the cars while they were being handled 'at the station. He had, within six or eight weeks…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Newbury ex rel. Newbury v. Getchel & Martin Lumber & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  2. Louisville & N. R. v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1900
  3. Yeager ex rel. Yeager v. Burlington, Cedar Rapids & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  4. Schneider v. Wolverine Portland Cement Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API