Legal Opinion

In Re Naturalization of F- G- & E- E- G

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 24, 1956PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAWSON, District Judge.

These contested petitions for naturalization raise the question whether adultery committed by petitioners before the effective date of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, 8 U.S.C.A. § 1101 et seq. but within the five-year period preceding the filing of the petitions for naturalization constitute per se a bar to naturalization because of the definition of good moral character contained in the 1952 Act, although it would not have been a bar per se under the preceding Act; and if not what considerations should be used by the Court at the present time in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. MenascheSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Petitions of RudderCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  3. Repouille v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  4. United States v. FranciosoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  5. Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Dickhoff v. ShaughnessyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
  2. In Re Vacontios'petitionDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
  3. In Re Pauschert's PetitionDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
  4. Petition for Naturalization of O— NDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1964
  5. In Re Naturalization of MayallDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1957

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API