Legal Opinion

Rush v. Emmons

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1938No. Docket No. 35, Calendar No. 40,069Published

1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.

Plaintiffs, who are the vendees in a land contract dated May 20, 1924, filed a bill of complaint seeking cancellation and rescission thereof because of a claimed breach of the contract by defendants. Defendants Emmons were the original vendors. They conveyed to defendants Hague and Kelser, who in turn assigned their interest to defendant Finance & Investment Service Company. The land contract provided that vendors might place a first mortgage upon the property described therein in a sum not to exceed $2,000, and that, when the balance due upon the contract should be reduced to the amount of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bennett v. HickeyMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Cossett v. O'RileyMichigan Supreme Court · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API