Henderson v. Windrush Operating Co., L.L.C.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1DissentDrew, J.
_JjThe majority fails to credit the three most important and explicit findings of the trial court that:
• a relation of confidence existed between Henderson and the defendants;
• the defendants misled4 Henderson on numerous occasions; and
• Mecom and Gaylord were untruthful in their trial testimony.
The trial court acquitted itself brilliantly in handling this highly contested matter, rendering a decision amply justified by the record. The trial court’s opinion is annexed as an attachment and adopted in toto in this dissent.
Mecom and Gaylord befriended and wooed Henderson. He trusted them to his…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Skannal v. BamburgLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
- Louisiana Ag Credit v. Livestock ProducersLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2007
- Homer Nat. Bank v. NixLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1990
- White v. GoldenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2008
- Garner v. HoffmanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1994