Legal Opinion
Oak Hall Cap & Gown Co. v. Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided March 26, 1990No. Nos. 89-1514, 89-1524PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOSEPH H. YOUNG, Senior District Judge:
The plaintiff, Oak Hall Cap & Gown Co. (“Oak Hall”), and the defendant, Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. (“Old Dominion”), have appealed orders of the magistrate entered at the conclusion of plaintiffs suit for damages. For the reasons stated below, we affirm the judgment of $87,869 in favor of Oak Hall, but vacate and remand the order denying its costs.
I
Oak Hall manufactures, sells, and rents academic, clerical, and judicial apparel, and primarily sells its gowns to manufacturer’s representatives who, in turn, sell to high schools and colleges. In…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Elmore & StahlSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Texas Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Contempo Metal Furniture Co. Of California, a Calif. Corp. v. East Texas Motor Freight Lines, Inc., Dba Etmf Freight SystemCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Continental Grain Company v. Frank Seitzinger Storage, Inc. v. Burlington Northern Railroad Company, A/K/A Burlington Northern RailwayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Sequa Corp. v. GBJ Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Williams v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
- Project Hope v. M/V IBN SINACourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Ward v. Allied Van Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
- Fredette v. Allied Van Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.