Legal Opinion

Alexander v. Shonyo

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1878PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error from- Doniphan District Court. Trover, brought by Alexander, to recover from Shonyo the value of a steam engine and boiler alleged to have been taken and converted by Shonyo.

Read the full summary

Error from- Doniphan District Court. Trover, brought by Alexander, to recover from Shonyo the value of a steam engine and boiler alleged to have been taken and converted by Shonyo. In January 1870, one Moyer and his wife executed a .mortgage of three certain lots in the city of White Cloud, to and in favor of Alexander, to secure an indebtedness of $1,500. One Andrew Parker was the owner of said three lots in 1869. At that time there were a planing mill and a saw mill situated on the property, and the property was otherwise improved. In December 1869, Parker and wife executed two mortgages of…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Horton, C. J.:

There are several reasons in this case for the affirmance of the judgment of the court below. In the first instance, it is very doubtful, under the provisions of our statute relating to mortgages of real estate, whether a mortgagee, before foreclosure of his lien, can maintain any action for damages to the premises described in the mortgage, notwithstanding the insolvency of the mortgagor, and the insufficiency of the mortgaged premises to pay the claim against it. Vanderslice v. Knapp, ante, p. 647; Chick v. Willetts, 2 Kas. 385. But we…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Opdyke v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Robbins v. SackettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API