Troutman v. Gowing
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from, Tama District Court. For the facts see the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Wright, C. J. —
I. The principles and rules recognized and settled in the case of Warnibold v. Schlicting (ante), *416must be regarded as decisive of tbe point most relied upon and discussed by counsel for appellant in this.
II. Complainant seeks to enforce the specific performance of a bond for the conveyance of land, signed by tbe bus-band alone, who is tbe sole respondent. By tbe final decree it is ordered that if tbe wife shall not join in tbe deed, one-third of tbe purchase-money shall be retained by tbe clerk (with whom tbe tender-money was deposited) until she should do so, or depart this…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Curtis v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Iowa · 1866
- Leach v. ForneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1866
- Hirschman v. ForehandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
- Zebley v. SearsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1874
- Hardin v. Wolf & CerfSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1877
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.