Legal Opinion

In re Tannenbaum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 7, 2005PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Respondent Samuel Tannenbaum was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the Second Judicial Department on March 30, 1949. Respondent is also admitted to practice in the State of Connecticut. At all times relevant to these proceedings, respondent maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department.

The Departmental Disciplinary Committee moved, inter alia, for an order pursuant to 22 NYCRR 603.4 (e) (1) (iii) immediately suspending respondent from the practice of law based upon uncontested evidence of professional misconduct…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re TannenbaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. In re HsuAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. In re NannaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re VasquezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. In re LeonardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API