In re Tannenbaum
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Respondent Samuel Tannenbaum was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the Second Judicial Department on March 30, 1949. Respondent is also admitted to practice in the State of Connecticut. At all times relevant to these proceedings, respondent maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department.
The Departmental Disciplinary Committee moved, inter alia, for an order pursuant to 22 NYCRR 603.4 (e) (1) (iii) immediately suspending respondent from the practice of law based upon uncontested evidence of professional misconduct…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- In re TannenbaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re HsuAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- In re NannaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
4Cited by2 opinions
- In re VasquezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re LeonardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007