Legal Opinion

B. v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 6, 2022No. 2:22-cv-01803Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA A.B., : Plaintiff, : CIVIL ACTION : v. : : CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, : No. 22-1803 Defendant. : MEMORANDUM Before the Court is the City of Philadelphia’s Motion to dismiss A.B.’s “petition” for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The City argues the Rooker-Feldman1 doctrine bars Plaintiff’s 0F claims, or in the alternative, the Court should abstain under Younger2 because A.B.’s claims 1F involve custody and removal proceedings which are ordinarily within the province of state courts. (ECF 3). Plaintiff disagrees. (ECF…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Lincoln Benefit Life Co. v. AEI Life, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
  5. Great Western Mining & Mineral Co. v. Fox Rothschild LLPCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API