Legal Opinion

Bruce v. Street

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 6, 1944No. 4-7283PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Griffin Smith, Chief Justice.

As a matter of substantive law, 1 appellant is correct. The Chancery Court for Sharp County, sitting, as the decree recites, “in lawful session” in the Northern District, did not have jurisdiction to try title to lands in the Southern District.

We do not reach merits of the case. Street sought bjr an action in Circuit Court, Southern District, to eject Bruce from realty in respect of which the dividing line between plaintiff and defendant was in dispute.

By Act 39, approved February 27, 1893, Sharp County was divided into judicial districts. Jurisdiction of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. MartinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1895
  2. Saliba v. SalibaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  3. Bonner v. JacksonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
  4. Kent v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1897
  5. Pryor v. MurphySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mark Twain Life Ins. Corp. v. CorySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  2. Crutchfield v. McLainSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959
  3. Mark Twain Life Ins. Corp. v. CorySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API