Legal Opinion · Dissent

Meyer v. Hawkinson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 2001No. 20000093Published

1DissentSandstrom, Justice

[¶ 40] Because the majority misapprehends the history of gambling in North Dakota and the working of our gambling laws, and misstates the public policy of our state, I respectfully dissent.

I

[¶ 41] Although a quarter of a century ago, a credible argument might have been made that the public policy of North Dakota opposed the enforcement of a contract relating to gambling, no such argument can prevail today.

[¶ 42] The early years of our statehood were shaped by the corruption of the Louisiana Lottery, the last of the so-called “great national lotteries.” So corrupt that it was kicked out of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Castilleja v. CameroTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Cermak v. CermakNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Hughes v. ColeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1996
  4. Daley v. American States Preferred Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Tschirgi v. Merchants National Bank of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API