Meyer v. Hawkinson
North Dakota Supreme Court
1DissentSandstrom, Justice
[¶ 40] Because the majority misapprehends the history of gambling in North Dakota and the working of our gambling laws, and misstates the public policy of our state, I respectfully dissent.
I
[¶ 41] Although a quarter of a century ago, a credible argument might have been made that the public policy of North Dakota opposed the enforcement of a contract relating to gambling, no such argument can prevail today.
[¶ 42] The early years of our statehood were shaped by the corruption of the Louisiana Lottery, the last of the so-called “great national lotteries.” So corrupt that it was kicked out of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Castilleja v. CameroTexas Supreme Court · 1967
- Cermak v. CermakNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Hughes v. ColeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1996
- Daley v. American States Preferred Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Tschirgi v. Merchants National Bank of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.