Legal Opinion

Birmingham Electric Co. v. Yoast

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 28, 1951No. 6 Div. 185PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

The question presented by appellant on this appeal is whether the court committed reversible error in granting a motion for a new trial made by appellee, who was plaintiff in the trial court, upon the ground that, after the trial of the case, plaintiff’s counsel ascertained that a juror, one Lee Cole, was biased and prejudiced in favor of the defendant, and as to which plaintiff and his counsel were not negligent. There was verdict and judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $1,350.

The suit was for personal injuries, as a result of a collision of defendant’s street car with…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Roan v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  2. Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. DrennenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  3. Batson v. State Ex Rel. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  4. Peterson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  5. Citizen's L. H. & P. Co. v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Freeman v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  2. Sanders v. ScarveySupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
  3. Atwell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977
  4. Weekley v. HornSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  5. Morris v. Zac Smith Stationery CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1963

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API