Legal Opinion

In re U. S. Aluminum Corp.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 8, 1989No. Appeals Nos. 341 C.D. 1988 and 474 C.D. 1988PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Senior Judge Narick,

U.S. Aluminum Corp. of Pennsylvania (Appellant) has appealed from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County which affirmed a decision of the Zoning Hearing Board (Board) of Marietta Borough (Borough) subjecting Appellant’s use of an aluminum shredder to limitations on the hours of operation. The Borough has cross-appealed to preserve its right to object to the trial court’s rejection of its res judicata argument.1

The procedural history of this matter is lengthy. Appellant operates an aluminum recycling business in the Borough.2 In 1971, it applied…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Valley View Civic Ass'n v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Bray v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Babin v. City of LancasterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Middletown Township v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Amoco Oil Co. v. Zoning Hearing Board of Middletown TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. German v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Police Pension Fund Ass'n Board v. HessCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Chicoine v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Township of Harrison v. SmithCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. W.J. Menkins Holdings, LLC v. Douglass Twp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API