Legal Opinion

Bland v. Bulloch County

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 16, 1992No. A92A0733PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Beasley, Judge.

In this condemnation case, the sole issue is whether the court erred in instructing the jury on how to determine the fair market value of a partial taking. It was a 250’-wide, 15-acre strip at an angle through the middle of condemnee’s 75-acre generally rectangular parcel, taken for a limited access road. Not at issue here is the determination of consequential benefits or consequential damages to the remainder; appellant does not challenge the court’s charge on the calculation of that item of damages.

1. The issue as framed in the first enumeration of error and ar*318gued was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Department of Transportation v. GunnelsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
  2. Reed v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  3. Rucker v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Chastain v. Fayette CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  2. Department of Transportation v. Patten Seed Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  3. Dunaway v. Columbia CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  4. Department of Transportation v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  5. Loggins v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API