Legal Opinion

Petrogulf Corp. v. Arco Oil & Gas Co.

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided April 5, 2000No. CIV.A. 00-B-34PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BABCOCK, District Judge.

Defendants move pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) to dismiss plaintiffs Complaint for failure to exhaust tribal court remedies. The motion is adequately briefed and oral argument will not materially aid its resolution. For the reasons set forth below, I construe defendants’ motion to dismiss as one for dismissal without prejudice, and grant the motion. Jurisdiction is asserted under 28 U.S.C. § 1332.

I

The following facts are undisputed unless otherwise noted. Under oil and gas leases entered into with private fee mineral owners,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. National Farmers Union Insurance v. Crow Tribe of IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Iowa Mutual Insurance v. LaPlanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Strate v. A-1 ContractorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. The State of Rhode Island v. the State of MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1838

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. World Fuel Services v. Nambe Pueblo DevelopmentDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API