Legal Opinion

Schleikorn v. Trachtenberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 10, 1996Published

1Opinion of the Court

*490The court correctly determined that the defendant failed to make a prima facie showing that he was entitled to judgment as a matter of law on the plaintiffs causes of action sounding in legal malpractice (see, Andrews Beverage Distrib. v Stern, 215 AD2d 706; Lauer v Rapp, 190 AD2d 778). The defendant, however, is entitled to summary judgment on the plaintiffs breach of contract cause of action. The defendant’s affidavit in support of his motion established that the plaintiff ratified the defendant’s acts (see, Ordinary Guy v Juniper Releasing, 199 AD2d 251, 252; Sheindlin v Sheindlin, 88 AD2d…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sheindlin v. SheindlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  2. Lauer v. RappAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. Andrews Beverage Distributor, Inc. v. SternAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. Ordinary Guy, Inc. v. Juniper Releasing, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API