Legal Opinion

United States v. Shakur

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 30, 1982No. 82 Cr. 312PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge.

Other requests by the defendants for pretrial discovery having been complied with by the government, upon the argument of this motion the defendants confined themselves to the following open items which are disposed of as indicated:

1. Brady Material. The government acknowledges its obligation under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963) to disclose prior to trial any exculpatory information in its possession and under its control, but contends that it “is not required to discover or ascertain evidence favorable to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Moore v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Palermo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. United States v. Wilson Arroyo-Angulo, Hugo Gomez, Jaime Rayo-Montano and Guillermo MorenoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. United States v. FeolaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
  2. United States v. PersicoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
  3. United States v. WilsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1983
  4. United States v. UptonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1994
  5. United States v. GuerrerioDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API