Legal Opinion

Borden v. Fahey

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 26, 1909PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Galveston County. Tried below before Hon. Bobt. G. Street.

1Opinion of the Court

HETLL, Associate Justice.

This is a proceeding by motion, as is provided for by article 2381, Bevised Statutes of 1895, to have the penalty denounced by the statute adjudged against the appellee on account of his failure to comply with his bid for certain property at execution sale. The court upon hearing the evidence refused to assess the penalty, and from its judgment the appeal is prosecuted.

Appellants A. P. Borden and Mamie P. Withers, executor and executrix of the estate of A. H. Pierce, deceased, the actors in this matter, in their representative capacity, on October 20, 1902, recovered…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. HatchellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1900

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Archenhold Co. v. SchaeferCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  2. Childress v. Ely and WalkerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  3. Jackson v. Universal Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API