Legal Opinion

Morganite, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided July 16, 1952No. C. D. 1448PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Judge:

The merchandise involved herein is invoiced as “Morganite strips for trolley inserts.” It was classified by the collector at 15 per centum ad valorem under the provisions of paragraph 216 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D. 51802. The plaintiff claims that the merchandise is dutiable under the same paragraph at the rate of 12 K per centum ad valorem.

The paragraph of the Tariff Act of 1930 and the amendment thereto by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D. 51802, so far as pertinent herein, provide as follows:

Par.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Knott v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Morganite, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  2. Morganite, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  3. Morganite, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  4. Morganite, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
  5. Morganite, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API