Morganite, Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Johnson, Judge:
The merchandise involved herein is invoiced as “Morganite strips for trolley inserts.” It was classified by the collector at 15 per centum ad valorem under the provisions of paragraph 216 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D. 51802. The plaintiff claims that the merchandise is dutiable under the same paragraph at the rate of 12 K per centum ad valorem.
The paragraph of the Tariff Act of 1930 and the amendment thereto by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D. 51802, so far as pertinent herein, provide as follows:
Par.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Knott v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
3Cited by14 opinions
- Morganite, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
- Morganite, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
- Morganite, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
- Morganite, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
- Morganite, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.