Legal Opinion

Hart v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1877PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Erom the Clinton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHiblaok, J.

This was a prosecution, founded on an indictment for grand larceny.

*600The indictment charges that Joseph Hart, on the 20th day of February, A. D. 1877, at the county of Clinton and State of Indiana, “ did then and there unlawfully and feloniously steal, take and carry away two bank-bills, of the denomination of twenty dollars each, a more particular description of which said twenty-dollar bank-bills can not now be given; said two twenty-dollar bank-bills being then and there of the value of twenty dollars each, and said two twenty-dollar bank-bills being then and there of the aggregate value of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Arnold v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Madison v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Wasson v. First National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Lang v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1900
  4. State ex rel. Schumacher v. GramelspacherIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Kirts v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API